STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL FRED ANDERSON, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL FRED ANDERSON, APPELLEE
432 So. 2d 204
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED on the authority of State v. Hicks, 421 So. 2d 510 (Fla.1982).
ORFINGER, C.J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shannon v. Anabel P. Mitchell, 460 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…not into the root causes of his criminal conduct, but only into whether the Florida Parole and Probation Commission’s aggregation rule for calculating a Presumptive Parole Release Date (PPRD) was properly applied in his case. In Shannon v. Turner, 432 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), the court treated a petition of the same petitioner on a similar matter as a petition for writ of mandamus, following Harrisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The Harris,son court…
-
Fuller v. Louie L. Wainwright & Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 458 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…ner’s commitment for a previous conviction used to aggregate the PPRD to June 25, 1981; and that petitioner was not sentenced on his subsequent conviction until December 23, 1982. Respondents acknowledge this court’s decision in Shannon v. Turner, 432 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), in the Commission’s response, which admits that the Commission cannot consider, in determining aggregation, a commitment which had expired at the time of current recommitment in setting the new PPRD. The Commission contends, how…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Hicks, 421 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1982)