C. O. BOLT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF SIMILARLY SITUATED EMPLOYEES OF THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
JOINT COUNCIL DINING CAR EMPLOYEES ET AL., APPELLEES
C. O. BOLT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF SIMILARLY SITUATED EMPLOYEES OF THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT,
JOINT COUNCIL DINING CAR EMPLOYEES ET AL., APPELLEES
301 F.2d 20
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The success of the appeal in this case must depend upon our finding that the trial court’s determination that action of the defendant Union, of which the appellants were members, was arbitrary or discriminatory against appellants and his class. To the contrary, we find that the evidence fully warranted the findings of the trial court and its conclusion to the effect that “The equities are with the Intervenor and the Union and against the plaintiff, and the defendant Union has the right to negotiate with the defendant Railroad for modification of the 1952 merger agreement.”
The judgment of the trial court is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1962)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enter. Ass'n OF Steam, 429 U.S. 507 (U.S. 1977)
-
Truck Drivers Union Local NO. 413 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 334 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence