DARRYL BROWN, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, PERCY BROWN, AND PERCY BROWN, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE COUNTY, D/B/A JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-06-07
No. 82-1040
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
432 So. 2d 715 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Caution
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants are not entitled to relief under either the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion in Cates v. Graham, 427 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tumulty v. State, 489 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
    …egoing rule required that she be furnished the addresses; that the personal safety exception to the rule was to be narrowly applied, relying on State v. Hassberger, 350 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1977). We find that the cases relied on by Tumulty, Pena v. State, 432 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Garcia v. State, 379 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), are inapposite because of our peculiar facts, i.e., appellant’s familiarity with all of the prior facts and the known identity of the witnesses. In any event, the court consi…
  • Bayshore v. State, 437 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …are both available and competent.” Id. at 1288. See also Lane v. State, 352 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). . The same adverse inference may be shown if the defendant raises alibi as a defense and then fails to call alibi witnesses. Pena v. State, 432 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Jacobs v. State 389 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 397 So. 2d 778 (Fla.1981); Daughtrey v. State, 325 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 336 So. 2d 600 (Fla.1976); Jenkins v. State, 317 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA…
  • State v. Martin, 522 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
    …81); United States v. Paoli, 603 F. 2d 1029 (2d Cir.1979). See also State v. Mason, 181 Ga.App. 806, 353 S.E. 2d 915 (1987). Unfortunately, some cases have repeated the Ro-viaro dictum without the necessary cave [*874] ats, see, e.g., Pena v. State, 432 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and, worse, some may have reflexively applied the dictum when they should not have. Fortunately, Judge Jorgenson’s opinion for the court has avoided this pitfall.…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw