KEVIN NEFF, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Fuksman, 468 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …hile the overwhelming number of Florida decisions, including post-De-nehy cases, contain statements that volun-tariness must be shown by clear and convincing evidence, Bailey; State v. Santamaria, 464 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State v. Spencer, 432 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Leonard v. State, 431 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), and while it is unusual for the court to so casually overrule prior case law, we will not, and cannot under Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So. 2d 431, 433-34 (Fla.1973), assume that th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• State v. Murray Herbert Sayers and Richard M. Zzie, 459 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …e Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). See also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980); Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); State v. Spencer, 432 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Since Sayers’ statement, standing alone, provided more than ample probable cause for the search of the warehouse,3 the items seized in such search should not have been suppressed. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. . This cour…
• State v. Caso, 441 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …PER CURIAM. For the reasons and authorities cited in State v. Spencer, 432 So. 2d 718, 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), the order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.…

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (U.S. 1982)
• New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1981)