TOMMY LEE STINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1983-06-08
No. 82-1990
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
432 So. 2d 738 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The order of revocation of probation is hereby affirmed with the exception that the provision therein finding the appellant in violation for having failed to pay costs of supervision is hereby stricken, the state having conceded on appeal that the appellant was not able to pay those costs. Accordingly, the order of revocation is affirmed as modified hereby.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Adams v. State, 459 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
    …id of evidence that appellant had the financial ability to pay the cost of supervision. Accordingly, we reverse the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay those costs and strike that finding from the order. Stinson v. State, 432 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). In all other respects the order of revocation is affirmed. ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.…
  • State v. Bruno Samuel Nardi, 434 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of State v. Tupiea, 432 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw