LEONARD BEAN A/K/A TOMMY LEE GREEN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Procter & Gamble Co. v. Swilley, 462 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …ndicated that the showing of need encompasses a showing of diligence by the party seeking discovery of another party’s work product. See Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Maze, 318 So. 2d 200, 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). See also Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Loomis, 432 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); H. Trawick, Jr., Florida Practice and Procedure § 16-3 (1983). Applying these principles to the case at hand, we find that respondents failed to make the showing required by Rule 1.280(b)(2). Our determination is not that respo…
• Ward L. Huet and Joan Huet v. Hillary Tromp and Andre Tromp, 912 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …ng a case, they are work product, but any work product privilege that existed ceases once the materials or testimony are intended for trial use. See 5500 North Corp. v. Willis, 729 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). See also Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Loomis, 432 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Wackenhut Corp. v. Crant-Heisz Ent., Inc., 451 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The first order denying the Huets’ motion for a protective order rendered February 16, 2005, was correctly decided because the Huets had included the…
• Raymond H. Castenholz, M.D. v. Bergmann, 696 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …y of the video photographer’s notes and report. We affirm the issue on cross-appeal without further comment, finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s rulings. Denny v. State, 617 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Loomis, 432 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Dodson v. Persell, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla.1980). A new trial was granted after the trial court found four jurors, including one alternate juror, failed to disclose prior litigation history during voir dire. Applying the test of D…

Authorities Cited

• Rodriguez v. State, 393 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
• Posner v. Flink, 393 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)