HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
NOAH S. CUTRER AND NICHOLAS D. OLIVIER, APPELLEES; NOAH S. CUTRER AND NICHOLAS D. OLIVIER, APPELLANTS, V. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, APPELLEE
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, APPELLANT,
NOAH S. CUTRER AND NICHOLAS D. OLIVIER, APPELLEES; NOAH S. CUTRER AND NICHOLAS D. OLIVIER, APPELLANTS, V. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, APPELLEE
309 F.2d 752
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Finding ourselves in accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as set forth in its opinion,1 we affirm its judgment for the reasons which it has assigned.
Affirmed.
. Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 568.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Popeko v. United States, 513 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1975)
-
Mrs. Lillian C. Stevens v. Humble OIL & Ref. Co., 346 F.2d 43 (5th Cir. 1965)