PAUL E. RHODES, APPELLANT,
v.
NORVAL HOUSTON ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissing appellant’s complaint. The exhaustive opinion of the trial court (Judge Van Pelt) published at 202 F.Supp. 624 contains a careful and detailed analysis of the essential facts. Judge Van Pelt’s well considered conclusions, which we believe to be correct and with which we concur, are supported by a wealth of authority. On the basis of said opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Also see: Kostal v. Stoner, 10 Cir., 292 F. 2d 492, certiorari denied 369 U.S. 868, 82 S.Ct. 1032, 8 L.Ed.2d 87 (4/30/62), rehearing denied 370 U.S. 920, 82 S.Ct. 1559, 8 L.Ed.2d 500 (6/11/62).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Whirl v. C. V. (Buster) Kern & Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., 407 F.2d 781 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Bauers v. Heisel, 361 F.2d 581 (3d Cir. 1966)
-
Norton v. McSHANE, 332 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1964)
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kostal v. Stoner, 292 F.2d 492 (10th Cir. 1961)
- Perry v. Illinois, 369 U.S. 868 (U.S. 1962)
- Ex parte Stickney, 369 U.S. 868 (U.S. 1962)
- Freeman v. Armour & Co., 370 U.S. 920 (U.S. 1962)
- Warren v. Larson, 370 U.S. 920 (U.S. 1962)