H. E. ATTERBURY, APPELLANT,
v.
A. S. V. CARPENTER, APPELLEE
H. E. ATTERBURY, APPELLANT,
A. S. V. CARPENTER, APPELLEE
310 F.2d 126
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this action involving multiple parties certain issues were segregated and separately tried resulting in judgment in favor of Appellee Carpenter. This appeal was taken from such judgment.
It does not appear, however, that there has been compliance with Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P., and for that reason this appeal must be dismissed.
We repeat what we said in Miles v. City of Chandler, 9 Cir., 1961, 297 F. 2d 690, 691:
“If, after our mandate goes down, the District Court sees fit to make the express determination and to give the express direction mentioned in Rule 54(b) and to enter judgment in conformity therewith, and if appellant appeals from such judgment, it will not be necessary for the parties to reprint their briefs or the present record on appeal. Such appeal, if taken, can be heard upon the present briefs and the present record, supplemented by a record of proceedings had in District Court after receipt of our mandate. However, we are not to be understood as suggesting that the District Court should or should not make the express determination or give the express direction mentioned in Rule 54(b), these being matters exclusively within the District Court’s discretion.”
Appeal dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Purdy Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Champion Home Builders Co., 594 F.2d 1313 (9th Cir. 1979)
-
Schnur & Cohan, Inc. v. McDONALD, 328 F.2d 103 (4th Cir. 1964)
-
William and Maxine Carey v. Greyhound Co., 424 F.2d 485 (9th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Miles v. City OF Chandler, 297 F.2d 690 (9th Cir. 1961)