EDGAR ALLAN GALLEGOS AND ANA GLORIA GALLEGOS, PETITIONERS,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, RESPONDENT

9th Cir. | 1962-11-02
No. 17815
310 F.2d 688 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1962) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of actions of the Immigration Service. They have been subjected to an order of deportation, have unsuccessfully pursued judicial review of that order. Gallegos v. Hoy, 9 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 665, certiorari denied, 1959, 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed.2d 1547. They then filed a petition to reopen the deportation proceedings in order that they might apply for discretionary relief from deportation. That petition was denied by the Board of Immigration Appeals and the present petition for review was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. The matter has been transferred to this court under 75 Stat. 650.

This court has taken the position that under 75 Stat. 650, we have original jurisdiction to review only final orders of deportation. Holz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 309 F. 2d 452; Mai Kai Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 305 F. 2d 239; Giova v. Rosenberg, 1962, 308 F. 2d 347. An order denying the reopening of proceedings is not such an order. It is therefore ordered that this matter be retransferred to the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw