MRS. EDNA LATIL NICHOLS, APPELLANT,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEE
MRS. EDNA LATIL NICHOLS, APPELLANT,
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEE
310 F.2d 704
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant having failed to object to the argument now contended to having been prejudicial, and no plain error or abdication of function by the District Judge appearing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reid, 5th Cir., 1935, 76 F. 2d 30; Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 5th Cir., 1954, 214 F. 2d 290, cert. den. 1954, 348 U.S. 875, 75 S.Ct. 111, 99 L.Ed. 688; Ford v. United Gas Corp., 5th Cir., 1958, 254 F. 2d 817, cert. den. 358 U.S. 824, 79 S.Ct. 40, 3 L.Ed.2d 64.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hoover, Inc. v. McCullough Indus., Inc., 380 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1967)
Authorities Cited
- Md. Cas. Co. v. Reid, 76 F.2d 30 (5th Cir. 1935)
- Wegmann v. Mannino, 358 U.S. 824 (U.S. 1958)
- Sadacca v. Nylonet Corp., 358 U.S. 824 (U.S. 1958)
- La. & Ark. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 348 U.S. 875 (U.S. 1954)
- Ford v. United GAS Corp., 254 F.2d 817 (5th Cir. 1958)
- La. & Ark. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 214 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1954)