ANTONIO ROMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-06-21
No. 82-2047
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
433 So. 2d 57 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court is directed to conform its written judgment of conviction to the plea proceedings and oral adjudication so as to reflect that the defendant pled nolo conten-dere rather than guilty to the charges and that, as to Count 1, entered a plea to and was convicted of unlawful possession of cannabis in violation of Section 893.13(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1981), a first-degree misdemeanor, rather than a third-degree felony. As modified, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The trial court is directed to conform its written order granting probation to its oral adjudication so as to reflect that on the charge of unlawful possession of cannabis, the defendant was placed on one year concurrent probation with a special condition of six months imprisonment in the Dade County Jail. As modified, the order granting probation is affirmed.

Affirmed with directions to modify.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jablonski v. Jablonski, 538 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
    …ts commencement both in regard to income and assets. See Fowler v. Fowler, 516 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Long v. Long, 505 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); McDonald v. McDonald, 429 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and Gersten v. Ger- [*49] sten, 433 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Secondly, from the wife’s testimony it is apparent that her plans for further training and education in order to become a certified ophthalmic technologist are equivocal, at best. For the time being, she “absolutely” wants to sta…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw