STEVE J. MCGEE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVE J. MCGEE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
433 So. 2d 66
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although we believe the trial court erred in considering and rejecting a proffer of evidence made by the state in the absence of the appellant, we have concluded that such error was harmless beyond any reasonable doubt and, accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s conviction. See Francis v. State, 413 So. 2d 1175 (Fla.1982).
ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., and C0-CALIS, PATRICIA W., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baron Transp. & Claims Ctr. v. Riley, 510 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…or the motion of a party if the record is incomplete. While the ultimate concern of the court is that cases be decided on the merits, it is not our purpose to “[lead] the parties by the hand in an attempt to get an adequate record.” Stack v. Lareau, 433 So. 2d 66, 68 (Fla.4th DCA 1983) (quoting Kauffman v. Baker, 392 So. 2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)); see also Rule 9.200(f), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, committee notes (“A failure to supplement the record after notice by the court may be held again…
-
Nankumar Cyril v. Jinorio, 570 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…fe. This result is dictated, as much as anything, by the failure of the appellant to provide us a transcript of the instant proceedings below, from which we could determine whether or not the record supports the trial court’s order. Stack v. Lareau, 433 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). But for the absence of a transcript, I would be inclined to lean towards reversal on points 2(B) and 2(D) raised by the appellant. These points are: 2(B). The stipulation and New York order constituted a waiver of modification…
Authorities Cited
- Francis v. State, 413 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 1982)