RAYMOND M. SCHRAMM AND DIANE SCHRAMM, APPELLANTS,
v.
MURDOCK-SALYER CHEVROLET COMPANY, STANLEY OAKES, MIDTOWN MOTORS, INC., GARTH CAMERON, B. A. TODKILL, TODKILL LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., AND COOPER OLDSMOBILE, INC., APPELLEES
RAYMOND M. SCHRAMM AND DIANE SCHRAMM, APPELLANTS,
MURDOCK-SALYER CHEVROLET COMPANY, STANLEY OAKES, MIDTOWN MOTORS, INC., GARTH CAMERON, B. A. TODKILL, TODKILL LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., AND COOPER OLDSMOBILE, INC., APPELLEES
312 F.2d 249
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained because the record contains no final judgment disposing of the claim asserted by the appellants against the appellees. We suggest that on remand the district court reconsider its order on the motions to quash in the light of such decisions as Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731, 735, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 91 L.Ed. 1209; and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v. Railway Express Agency, 6 Cir., 253 F. 2d 780, 784; and in the light of the principles stated in 1A Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 355, p. 352; and 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 12.16, p. 222 of 1961 supplement. Time for appeal of any judgment entered after remand shall run from the entry of that judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schramm v. Oakes, 352 F.2d 143 (10th Cir. 1965)
Authorities Cited
- Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 (U.S. 1947)
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Ry. Express Agency, Inc., 253 F.2d 780 (6th Cir. 1958)