JOHN SAULS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
D. FREEMAN ET AL., COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, APPELLEES
JOHN SAULS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
D. FREEMAN ET AL., COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF VOLUSIA COUNTY, APPELLEES
24 Fla. 225
Florida Supreme Court (1888)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for a rehearing filed in this cause has been considered. It suggests nothing that had not been carefully considered by ns in reaching the conclusions set forth in the main opinion.
In so far as the petition is a reargnment or assumes any new ground or position not taken before, it is clearly in violation of Supreme Court Rule 21, and the practice of this court, as has been settled by the adjudications. Smith vs. Croom, 7 Fla., 180; First Nat. Bank vs. Ashmead, 2 So. Reptr., 665; s. c. 23 Fla., 379.
A rehearing is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. City of Lakeland, 94 Fla. 347 (Fla. 1927)…a. 462, 2 South. Rep. 853; Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 475, 50 South. Rep. 754; Da Costa v. Dibble, 45 Fla. 237, 33 South. Rep. 466; Malsby v. Gamble, 61 Fla. 327, 54 South. Rep. 766; Stewart. v. Preston, 80 Fla. 479, 86 South. Rep. 348; Sauls v. Freeman, 24 Fla. 225, 4 South. Rep. 577; Hart v. Stribling, 25 Fla. 453, 6 South. Rep. 455; Payne v. Ivey, 83 Fla. 436, 93 South. Rep. 143. In the latter case this Court said, speaking through Mr. [*376] Justice Taylor, that a joining of issue with the Court in the app…
-
Herbert H. Pape, Inc. v. Finch, 102 Fla. 425 (Fla. 1931)…ance of a permit from the court for such argument. Such a petition this Court has held to be violative of the rule and will be dismissed without [*443] further consideration. Finlayson v. Lipscomb, 15 Fla. 558; Jones v. Fox, supra; Sauls v. Freeman, 24 Fla. 225, 4 South. Rep. 577. The interesting but obvious argument of the dissenting-judges in the case of DaCosta v. Dibble, 45 Fla. 225, 33 South. Rep. 466, is by no means convincing. Just what is meant by saying that the rule “is broad enough to require t…
-
Etta C. Mann v. Etchells, 132 Fla. 409 (Fla. 1938)…, 2 South. Rep. 853; Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 475, 50 South. Rep. 754; DaCosta v. Dibble, 45 Fla. 237, 33 South. Rep. 466; Malsby v. Gam [*418] ble, 61 Fla. 327, 54 South. Rep. 766, Stewart v. Preston, 80 Fla. 479, 86 South. Rep. 348; Sauls v. Freeman, 24 Fla. 225, 4 South. Rep. 577; Hart v. Stribling, 25 Fla. 453, 6 South. Rep. 455; Payne v. Ivey, 83 Fla. 436, 93 South. Rep. 143. “In the latter case this court said, speaking through Mr. Justice Taylor, that a joining of issue with the Court-in the applicati…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith and Armistead v. Croom, 7 Fla. 180 (Fla. 1857)
- The First Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. Ashmead, 23 Fla. 379 (Fla. 1887)