CAROLYN KENDRICK, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Brown, 527 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …e indistinguishable, the present appeal — were it in a criminal case — would then come within the express authority given to the State to appeal ”[a]n order dismissing an indictment or information." § 924.07(1) Fla.Stat. (1987); see State v. Nieman, 433 So. 2d 572, 572-73 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) ("Even if the state’s right to appeal is [*208] determined to be statutory, chapter 924, Florida Statutes (1981), grants the state a right to appeal from ‘an order dismissing an indictment or in-formation_’ The semant…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Small v. State, 454 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …e’s June 3 motion for continuance. The rule is well settled in Florida that a defense-requested continuance takes the matter out of the operation of the speedy trial rule. See Strickland v. State, 435 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State v. Nieman, 433 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Ehn v. Smith, 426 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); and see also State v. McCrery, 429 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); State v. Brown, 394 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So. 2d 968 (Fla.1980); State ex…
• State v. Sagre, 435 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …date from the appellate court. Lowe v. Price, 437 So. 2d 142 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(3) and 3.191(g). Neither can the dismissal be sustained on constitutional speedy trial grounds because there is no showing of prejudice. State v. Nieman, 433 So. 2d 572 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). Reversed. The Court will not entertain a Motion for Rehearing.…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Page, 418 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1982)