UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
HAROLD WAPNICK, JAMES LAFAZIA, CHARLES GERSH, AND DAVID BRILL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
HAROLD WAPNICK, JAMES LAFAZIA, CHARLES GERSH, AND DAVID BRILL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
315 F.2d 96
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The evidence here was quite sufficient and the case was fairly tried and properly presented to the jury. Hence we find no reversible error. Defendant Wapnick’s contention of double jeopardy is prima facie untenable in the light of United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 141, 67 L.Ed. 314, and Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hutul, 416 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1969)
-
United States v. Feinberg, 383 F.2d 60 (2d Cir. 1967)
-
United States v. Musgrave, 483 F.2d 327 (5th Cir. 1973)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187 (U.S. 1959)
- United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377 (U.S. 1922)