STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JORGE MORATON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court addressed whether convictions for burglary with an assault and battery violate double jeopardy, holding that they do not because the offenses are substantively different.
The court held that convictions for burglary with an assault and battery do not violate double jeopardy as they are substantively distinct offenses.
Savino was convicted of burglary with an assault and battery. He argued that his conviction and sentence for both offenses violated double jeopardy be…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968); State v. Battleman, 374 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Taylor v. State, 355 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 361 So. 2d 835 (Fla.1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (U.S. 1968)
- Taylor v. State, 355 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- State v. Battleman, 374 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Williams v. State, 374 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)