RONALD A. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONALD A. CHAPMAN, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
433 So. 2d 1021
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla.1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Flemenbaum v. Lily Flemenbaum, 636 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…by the husband, we find no reversible error. The orders of the trial court are affirmed. GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur. . The pendency of the appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to hear the rule 1.540 motion. Calehuff v. Calehuff, 433 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The appeal did not toll the time for filing the rule 1.540(b) motion. Legler v. Kwitney, Kroop & Scheinberg, P.A., 520 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami v. George Constr. Corp., 153 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d…
-
Magula v. Dr. Charles Infante, D.D.S., 616 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…e claim against the former attorney. We affirm, as allegations of legal malpractice against the attorney do not constitute extrinsic fraud so as to set aside the judgment. Parker v. Parker, 585 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Calehuff v. Calehuff, 433 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1981)