NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES VERNON FONDREN, GEORGE WALDENMAIER & SONS, INC., AND AMY L. BENOIT, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, a New Hampshire insurer, appealed the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in a suit arising from an automobile accident in Florida. The court held that Florida's long-arm statute applies because National Grange knowingly issued an automobile insurance policy with unrestricted territorial coverage that included Florida, making a loss in the state a foreseeable consequence.
The court held that Florida's long-arm statute, section 48.193(1)(d), applies because National Grange contracted to insure a risk located within Florida; that a loss in Florida was a foreseeable consequence of issuing an unrestricted nationwide policy; and that National Grange has sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy due process requirements.
[1] A foreign insurance company submits to the jurisdiction of Florida courts under the long-arm statute when it contracts to insure a risk located within Florida at the time…
[2] An insurance policy covering the entire United States and Canada, without territorial restrictions, contemplates the risk of loss occurring anywhere within those limits,…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Any person ... who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits that person ... to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state for any cause of action arising from the doing of any of the following: (d) Contracts to insure any person, property or risk located within this state at the time of contracting.”
The operative Florida long-arm statute language that the court applies to establish jurisdiction over the foreign insurer.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn June 6, 1979, James Fondren was injured in an automobile accident in Florida when struck by a vehicle owned by George Waldenmaier and insured by Na…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Long Arm Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
ANSTEAD, Judge.
This is an appeal from a non-final order denying National Grange Mutual’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person. National Grange sought to dismiss the action alleging that it was a New Hampshire corporation that is not licensed to and conducts no business in Florida and that the subject insurance policy was issued in New York.
On June 6, 1979 James Fondren was allegedly injured in an automobile accident when his car was struck by a car owned by George Waldenmaier. Waldenmaier’s car was insured by National Grange Mutual Insurance Company. The policy insures against the risk of bodily injury and property damages. The policy territory includes the entire United States and Canada. No language restricts coverage to New York State where the policy was issued. Fon-dren filed suit against National Grange and others. National Grange had previously denied coverage for the accident and did not furnish representation for the other defendants in the negligence action.
Section 48.193(1), Florida Statutes (1981) states,
Any person ... who personally or through an agent does any of the acts enumerated in this subsection thereby submits that person ... to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state for any cause of action arising from the doing of any of the following:
(d) Contracts to insure any person, property or risk located within this state at the time of contracting.
National Grange contends that since, at the time of contracting, the persons, properties, and risks insured were in New York State, not Florida, the long arm statute, section 48.193(l)(d), does not apply. Fon-dren contends that the statute applies because the insurance contract insured a risk within the State of Florida.
In Atlantic Lines LTD. v. M/V Domburgh, 473 F.Supp. 700 (S.D.Fla.1979) an insurance company was sued after its insured ran a ship into a wharf located in Jacksonville, Florida. The insurance company, a foreign corporation, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, arguing that section 48.193 did not provide personal jurisdiction over the company. The court disagreed, finding that the insurance policy, while not made within the State of Florida, was made with Florida commerce in mind. This intent was evidenced by the insurance company insuring worldwide. The policy in question also contained a United States deductible to insure risks while the ship plied Florida waters.
In our view, although the facts are not as compelling, the analysis relied upon by the court in Atlantic also applies to the facts here. National Grange’s policy territory encompassed the entire United States. The company was aware that the risk of loss was coextensive with the policy territory and that a loss could occur anywhere in the country. The fact that the loss occurred in Florida was a foreseeable consequence of issuing the policy with the unrestricted territory language. Thus, the Florida long arm statute, section 48.193(l)(d), . should apply to National Grange.
National Grange also contends that, even if section 48.193(l)(d) applies in the instant case, the requisite minimum contacts required to satisfy constitutional due process guarantees do not exist between the company and the State of Florida so as to subject National Grange to the jurisdiction of Florida courts. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945); World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 100 S.Ct. 580, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). We cannot agree. As noted above, by knowingly insuring a vehicle without limitation as to its location within the United States or Canada the company must contemplate that it may have to be involved in litigation anywhere within those territorial limits. Presumably, a prudent automobile owner would not travel outside the bounds provided in his liability insurance contract. We do not believe the company can authorize its insured to travel within Florida, thereby incurring the risk of an accident within the state, and then claim that it does not have to respond to litigation following the occurrence of such an accident. To authorize such a stance would be patently unfair to Florida residents who may be injured by the insured vehicle.
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial court.
LETTS, C.J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Meyer v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 492 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 1986)…EHRLICH, Justice. We have for review Auto Club Insurance Association v. Meyer, 458 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), which directly conflicts with National Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fondren, 433 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 443 So. 2d 980 (Fla.1983). We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and approve the decision below. In April 1983, the petitioner, then a Michigan resident, was involved in an automobile…1 / 2
-
Strickland Ins. Grp. v. Shewmake, 642 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…tatutes (1991), of Florida’s Long-arm statute, “acquiesced to the jurisdiction of the Courts of this state by agreeing to insure against an accident and loss_” The trial court denied Atlantic’s motion citing National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fondren, 433 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 443 So. 2d 980 (Fla.1983). In order to subject Atlantic to jurisdiction in Florida, a two prong test must be met: (1) Atlantic must have performed one of [*1161] the acts in the Florida Long-arm Statute, Section 48.19…
-
Kight v. NEW Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co., 441 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…ism’d, 383 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.1980), Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Mills, 367 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. den., 376 So. 2d 74 (Fla.1979). We express direct conflict with National Grange Mutual Insurance Company v. Fondren, 433 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, C.J., and WATSON, Associate Judge, concur.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Int'l Shoe Co. v. State OF Wash., 326 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1945)
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (U.S. 1980)