ERNEST JAMES LOPUS, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, RESPONDENT
ERNEST JAMES LOPUS, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, RESPONDENT
319 F.2d 855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1963)
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. .“The second sentence of § 4246 clearly makes commitment under ■§ 4248 applicable to persons found menially incompetent under § 4244 who meet the conditions specified in § 4247” (Greenwood v. United States, 350 U.S. 366, 374, 76 S.Ct. 410, 100 L.Ed. 412 (1956), and the District Court erred in holding to the contrary. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for “a hearing to determine the existence of the conditions specified in § 4247,” and for the entry of appropriate findings and judgment thereon in accordance with the proviso of Section 4248. Op. cit. supra.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Logan Peter Rollins v. Haskins, 348 F.2d 454 (6th Cir. 1965)
-
Terrell v. Perini, 414 F.2d 1231 (6th Cir. 1969)
-
Harris v. Maxwell, 337 F.2d 710 (6th Cir. 1964)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Greenwood v. United States, 350 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1956)