ROBERT LEAK, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted under a three-count indictment for two violations of Title 22, § 502, D.C. Code, assault with a dangerous weapon, and one violation of Title 22, § 3204, carrying a dangerous weapon. On this appeal, he urges that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury on the question of self defense.
We think the trial court adequately and properly instructed the jury on this point. In addition, it is to be noted that no objection to the judge’s charge was made by appellant’s trial counsel.1
We have examined the other points raised on appeal, and find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
. Present counsel, appointed by this court, was not appellant’s counsel in tbe District Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Hawkins Sandblasting, Inc. v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 668 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
-
Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Robinson, 419 F.2d 1197 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
-
United States v. Seckinger, 408 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence