HAZEL M. MEERDINK
v.
IRMA OTT V. THE AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT

3d Cir. | 1963-10-18
No. 14364
323 F.2d 366 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1963)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and have weighed the arguments of counsel for the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the proceedings in the court below and we find the appeal lacking in merit. The judgment will be affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw