GEORGE D. DUNN, PETITIONER,
v.
SENTRY INSURANCE, ETC., RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 1983-07-08
No. 83-986
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and CO-WART, JJ., concur.
434 So. 2d 45 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This case is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari and an accompanying petition for emergency stay writ. It is necessary for petitioner to provide this court with an appendix and because he failed to do so the petitions are denied. Rule 9.100(e), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure; Aleshire v. Ackerman, 418 So. 2d 307 (Fla 5th DCA 1982)‘

Writ denied.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and CO-WART, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cook v. City OF Winter Haven Police Dep't, 837 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
    …ng an appendix and appropriate references thereto. This is not a case where a petition has been properly dismissed based on a party’s complete failure to supply an appendix or failure to move to amend their petition. See, e.g., Dunn v. Sentry Ins., 434 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (denying petition for writ of certiorari due to petitioner’s failure to supply an appendix); Aleshire v. Ackerman, 418 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (same); see also City of Miami v. Powers, 313 So. 2d 35 (Fla.1975) (dismissing…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw