VINCENT A. SHEEHY III, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
EDWIN H. ESTES, APPELLEE
VINCENT A. SHEEHY III, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
EDWIN H. ESTES, APPELLEE
324 F.2d 502
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1963)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In deciding the plaintiffs’ claim in an action where jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, the district court severed a counterclaim for future disposition, and thereafter entered a judgment, from which this appeal stems, against the appellants. Some of the specifications of error raise questions of Alabama law which we think were properly decided by the district court. The other contentions of the appellants present procedural questions, and as to these we conclude that no error is apparent and no prejudice is shown. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 361 F.2d 512 (5th Cir. 1966)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transmarine Navigation Corp. & its subsidiary, 380 F.2d 933 (9th Cir. 1967)
-
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 567 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence