MRS. YVONNE BURAS, WIDOW OF OLIVER V. ADOLPH, APPELLANT,
v.
BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the exaction provided for by LSA-R.S. 22:656 is a penalty, not interest, and therefore the amount involved is sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction.
Plaintiff sued defendant, seeking an award of penalties under LSA-R.S. 22:656 for the insurer's alleged arbitrary and capricious refusal to pay a deat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Claims cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The narrow question presented here is whether the exaction provided for by LSA-R.S. 22:6561 is interest, or is not interest, in determining whether the amount involved is sufficient to hold federal jurisdiction over this case,
The district court determined, upon appellant’s declaration, that the exaction was in the nature of a penalty, not interest. We think this holding is correct.
The State of Louisiana has a statutory interest rate of 5%, which is in derogation of deciding this 6% exaction interest also. Moreover, the 6% is not due if the insurance contract is settled within 60 days. The federal statute 2 sets the minimum in removals at $10,-000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. We hold that this exaction is intended to be in the nature of a coercive penalty towards prompt settlement. The statutory amount here sued for is, therefore, sufficient. The appellant’s complaint states, according to LSA-R.S. 22:656, that the
«* * * defendant has refused and/or neglected to pay petitioner under said policy [for more than 60 days], and said refusal on the part of the defendant is arbitrary, capricious, unwarranted and without probable cause and therefore the Petitioner is entitled to an award of penalties as provided for in the Insurance Code of the State of Louisiana »
^ ^ ,, . , , The Supreme Court and this Court has uniformly, m resolving such questions, looked to the amount the plaintiff m good faith demands and, here, it ex- . .... ... .. ’ ’
Affirmed.
. Ҥ 656 Payment of claims; life policies; penalty
“All death claims arising under policies of insurance issued or delivered within this state shall be settled by the insurer within sixty days from the date of receipt of due proof of death and should the insurer fail to do so without just cause, then the amount due shall bear interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date of receipt of due proof of death by the insurer until paid.” Amended and reenacted Acts 1958, No. 125.
. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clark v. Nat'l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167 (6th Cir. 1975)
-
The Ins. Co. OF N. Am. v. Keeling, 360 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1966)