HATTIE RAY KING AND JAMES ALBERT KING, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
HATTIE RAY KING AND JAMES ALBERT KING, APPELLANTS,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
327 F.2d 495
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1964)
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, we conclude that’ there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court’s comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beto v. Sykes, 360 F.2d 411 (5th Cir. 1966)
-
United States ex rel. Anthony Russo v. The State OF NEW Jersey & the Principal Keeper of the State Prison at Trenton, 438 F.2d 1343 (3d Cir. 1971)
-
Sebring v. Beto, 354 F.2d 1000 (5th Cir. 1966)