IRVING I. BASS, TRUSTEE, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
MILO V. OLSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the order appealed from was not a final order and therefore not appealable.
The district court reversed findings of fact made by a referee and remanded the matter for further hearings. The appellee moved to dismiss the appeal.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Order Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Before considering the appeal herein, we are required to pass on appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. The order of the district court appealed from, dated May 28,1963, reverses certain findings of fact made by the referee as clearly erroneous, and remands the matter back to the referee for further hearings and findings.
Entirely apart from the issue attempted to be raised on this appeal, there exists the requirement of further testimony, further findings and possible second appeal thereon. Thus the order appealed from “did not end the litigation or finally determine the rights of the parties.”
There therefore exists no appealable order before us. Petersen v. Sampsell, 9 Cir. 1948,170 F. 2d 555; Hillcrest Lumber Co. v. Terminal Factors, Inc., 2 Cir. 1960, 281 F. 2d 323.
We would, if we could, determine the issue raised on this appeal, but we cannot. We will, however, look with favor upon a motion to hear a subsequent appeal, if any, on the existing briefs, an enlarged transcript, additional typewritten briefs, if any are necessary, and an expedited time schedule.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clark v. Kraftco Corp., 447 F.2d 933 (2d Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- Hillcrest Lumber Co., Inc. v. Terminal Factors, Inc., 281 F.2d 323 (2d Cir. 1960)
- Petersen v. Christ's Church of the Golden Rule, 170 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1948)