CARL THAYSEN, APPELLANT,
v.
LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This civil action was removed to the federal district court from the Common Pleas Court of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, in which it commenced. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446. The appellant’s motion for remand was denied and the appellee was granted leave to amend the jurisdictional allegations of its petition for removal. The present appeal followed. The denial of a motion for remand, such as we have here, is not a final decision appealable under § 1291 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. Peterson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et al., 268 F. 2d 567 (7th Cir. 1959); Wynn v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 212 F. 2d 953 (9th Cir. 1954); Tinkoff v. Holly, 209 F. 2d 527 (7th Cir. 1954); Lewis v.
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 183 F. 2d 29, 21 A.L.R.2d 757 (5th Cir. 1950). As an interlocutory decision it is not within the category of those orders appealable under § 1292 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. The appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins, 743 F.2d 984 (3d Cir. 1984)
-
Iannelli v. Long, 487 F.2d 317 (3d Cir. 1973)
-
McKEEHAN v. United States, 438 F.2d 739 (6th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lewis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 183 F.2d 29 (5th Cir. 1950)
- Wynn v. Reconstr. Fin. Corp., 212 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1954)
- Tinkoff v. Holly, 209 F.2d 527 (7th Cir. 1954)
- Peterson v. Brotherhood OF Locomotive Firemen AND Enginemen, 268 F.2d 567 (7th Cir. 1959)