JOHN SHOOK, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
CAROLYN D. SHOOK, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final judgment dissolving a seven-year marriage involving no children. We find no error in the award to the wife of the husband’s interest in the marital home as an equitable distribution of the parties’ assets nor do we find an abuse of discretion in the award of rehabilitative alimony. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We also affirm the trial court’s refusal to allow the husband to take the deposition of the wife’s treating psychiatrist where the wife did not offer the testimony of her psychiatrist and the court appointed a psychiatrist to examine the wife and testify at trial. See Roper v. Roper, 336 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). All other points are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edco Enters., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cnty. Unsafe Structures Bd. & City of Miami Beach, 458 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…disregarding the requirements of Section 202.2(b), the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law. See City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2d 624, 626 (Fla.1982); Police Pension Board, City [*20] of Hollywood v. Neilson, 435 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). In their challenge to petitioner’s standing, respondents contend that the Board does not have the authority to order Edco to make repairs or to secure the buildings because Edco is not the owner of the property. We reject that…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
- Thellie S. Roper v. Roper, 336 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)