EARLENE BROWN, APPELLANT,

v.

SUNLAND TRAINING CENTER, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, CRAWFORD AND COMPANY, AND THE BUREAU OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Arguello v. People's Tr. Ins. Co., 315 So. 3d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
• Greater Orlando Aviation Auth. v. Bulldog Airlines, Inc., 705 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …ng must be so clear and understandable that an ordinary and knowledgeable party will know what he is contracting away); F.D.I.C. v. Carre, 436 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So. 2d 416 (Fla.1984); Meyer v. Caribbean Interiors, Inc., 435 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Middleton v. Lomaskin, 266 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (generally, exculpatory contracts attempting to relieve party of his own negligence are not looked on with favor, but such contracts are valid and enforceable if [*122] suc…
• The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville, 137 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …isconduct, or commission. (emphasis added). In interpreting a contract, the court must review the contested phrases or words as part of the whole contract, rather than looking at the words or phrases separately. Meyer v. Caribbean Interiors, Inc., 435 So. 2d 936, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (citation omitted). Wherever possible, the provisions of the contract must be read so that they do not conflict even though at first glance they may appear conflicting. Id. “Where a contract is clear and unambiguous, it is th…

Authorities Cited

• Jackson v. Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 433 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)