UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
THELMA PORTEE, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the admission of the defendant's statement, while damaging, did not vitiate the conviction given the overwhelming other evidence of guilt.
Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of untaxpaid distilled spirits found in an unoccupied house near her residence. Evidence showed a man w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Admissibility Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Tried before a jury on a three-count indictment for unlawful possession1 of untaxpaid distilled spirits in the City of Columbia, South Carolina, Thelma Portee was convicted on the third count. She now appeals.
The whiskey was found in an unoccupied house owned by her, two doors— about 100 to 150 feet — from her home. While the Government agents had her residence under surveillance, an automobile drove up to the vacant house on February 12, 1963, just after midnight. From the car a man walked to the home of the accused, rapped on the door “quite hard several times” and called out, “Thelma, I need the key.” With the knock and exclamation, the lights went on; a conversation ensued, too low to be heard by the agents. In the darkness a man moved from appellant’s home to the vacant house, from which then came the sound of the handling of fruit jars and cardboard cases. A few minutes, and a man emerging from the untenanted building was arrested. Search of the place disclosed 27% gallons of illicit spirits. At home was appellant Portee, the lights still burning, well after midnight.
The point of this appeal is the introduction in evidence of the exclamation— “Thelma, I need the key.” While of course these words were damaging to the accused, we think in the circumstances receipt of this evidence did not vitiate the conviction. The record teems with other proof of the appellant’s guilt, and it is unnecessary to elaborate upon the precise grounds warranting the acceptance of the statement in evidence.
As we find no error in the judgment of the District Court, we affirm.
Affirmed.
. 26 U.S.C. § 5604(a) (1) (Supp.1963).