SCOTT PAULDING, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM
^ , „ , ,. On consideration of petitioners petition for leave to prosecute an appeal without prepayment of costs, and of the responsive pleadings filed thereto, and of petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel, it is
Ordered by the court that petitioner’s aforesaid petition is hereby denied without prejudice to the filing by petitioner of a motion in the District Court pursuant to Title 28, Section 2255, containing the allegations made by petitioner in his aforesaid petition to this court and without prejudice to the District Court entertaining a motion to vacate the sen-fence heretofore imposed and resentenc-ing appellant so as to permit a timely direct appeal should the District Court determine that such action is warranted, following a hearing on the allegations which petitioner may include in his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to Title 28, Section 2255. See Dodd v. United States, 321 F. 2d 240 (Ninth Circuit 1963) and Calland v. United States, 323 F. 2d 405 (Seventh Circuit 1963), and R
Further ordered by the court that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dillane v. United States, 350 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
-
Cureton v. United States, 396 F.2d 671 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
-
Johnson v. United States, 405 F.2d 1072 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dodd v. United States, 321 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1963)
- Calland v. United States, 323 F.2d 405 (7th Cir. 1963)