NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
GLOBE-WERNICKE SYSTEMS COMPANY, DIVISION OF GLOBE-WERNICKE INDUSTRIES, INC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that failure to file exceptions to a trial examiner's decision precludes attacking the unfair labor practice findings, and compliance with the order does not moot the enforcement action.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) petitioned for summary enforcement of its order against respondent. Respondent did not file exceptions to th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mootness Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
The National Labor Relations Board has filed a petition for summary enforcement of its order dated April 2, 1964, in case No. 8-CA-3177.
The record shows that respondent did not file exceptions to any of the findings set forth in the decision of the Trial Examiner, which decision thereupon was adopted by the Board. In the absence of extraordinary circumstances the failure of respondent to file exceptions to the decision precludes it from attacking any of the unfair labor practice findings contained therein. 29 U.S.C. § 160(c); N. L. R. B. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318, 322, 82 S.Ct. 344, 7 L.Ed.2d 312.
Respondent opposes summary enforcement on the asserted ground that it has complied fully with the order of the Board. Assuming that respondent has so complied (a fact which is denied by the Board), it is well settled that compliance with an order of the Board is no defense to the entry of an order of enforcement. Abandonment of an unfair labor practice does not cause the controversy to become moot. N. L. R. B. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563, 567, 70 S.Ct. 833, 94 L.Ed. 1067; N. L. R. B. v. Toledo Desk and Fixture Co., 158 F. 2d 426 (C.A.6).
It is ordered that summary enforcement of the order of the Board be and hex-eby is granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. The Richard W. Kaase Co. & Bakery & Confectionery Workers Int'l Union, 346 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1965)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, 357 F.2d 841 (3d Cir. 1966)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferraro's Bakery, Inc., 353 F.2d 366 (6th Cir. 1965)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc., 339 U.S. 563 (U.S. 1950)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp., 368 U.S. 318 (U.S. 1961)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Toledo Desk & Fixture Co., 158 F.2d 426 (6th Cir. 1946)