SPENCER, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
SARAH KENDRICK KENNINGTON, APPELLEE
SPENCER, INC., APPELLANT,
SARAH KENDRICK KENNINGTON, APPELLEE
337 F.2d 289
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 48 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It was not error for the trial court to overrule the motion for summary judgment. The issue whether appellant’s employee was an agent of appellant acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the collision is a fact question which has been resolved by the jury upon a proper submission of the applicable law to it.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Randy Int'l, Ltd. v. Am. Excess Corp., 501 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
-
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 390 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1968)
-
Ala. Ass'n OF Ins. Agents v. Bd. OF Governors OF the Fed. Reserve Sys., 533 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1976)
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence