ROY A. SPAULDING, APPELLANT,
v.
ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., OF DELAWARE, AND WILLIAM T. CHAMBERLIN, JR., APPELLEES

4th Cir. | 1964-10-07
No. 9492
337 F.2d 361 United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1964)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a directed verdict for the defendant was proper because the plaintiff's failure to see a stalled tractor-trailer constituted contributory negligence under West Virginia law.


Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff, driving through an intersection, collided with a large tractor-trailer stalled in his lane. The plaintiff did not see the tractor-trail…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff, driving through a lighted intersection in downtown Charleston, West Virginia, ran head-on into the front of a large tractor-trailer, which was stalled in the plaintiff’s line of traffic. The plaintiff did not see the tractor until almost the moment of impact. He thought he had had time to touch his ¡brake pedal, but there was insufficient time for his brakes to take effect.

•Under these circumstances, the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant. It did so upon the theory that West Virginia law requires a motorist to look effectively and holds him guilty <of dontributory negligence when he fails to see what a motorist exercising due care should have seen. Such contributory negligence is an absolute bar to recovery in West Virginia, whatever the fault of the defendant.

The District Court’s conclusion was in accordance with the West Virginia authorities. Smith v. Penn Line Service, Inc., 145 W.Va. 1, 113 S.E. 2d 505; Scott v. Hoosier Engineering Co., 117 W.Va. 395, 185 S.E. 553; Divita v. Atlantic Trucking Co., 129 W.Va. 267, 40 S.E. 2d 324; Wolfe v. Beatty Motor Express, Inc., 143 W.Va. 238, 101 S.E. 2d 81.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw