STEVEN JAY CLINE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVEN JAY CLINE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
436 So. 2d 193
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See M.P. v. State, 430 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Thomas, 428 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Scott v. Scott, 504 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…eased depending upon the circumstances of the parties. The husband’s contentions are so legally compelling that we cannot sustain the alimony award. However, the elimination of the provision for child support is also suspect. In Hartman v. Hartman, 436 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), the parties’ property settlement agreement provided that the wife would receive a fixed monthly sum for child support so long as the children were minors and the wife did not remarry “regardless of which of the children may be do…
Authorities Cited
- M.P. v. State, 430 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Sherman v. E.V. Smith Co. & Fla. Farm Bureau, 428 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- State v. Harry V. Thomas/Hubert D. Williams, 428 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)