MAGIC FINGERS, INC., PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT E. AUGER ET AL., DEFENDANTS, APPELLEES

1st Cir. | 1964-12-30
No. 6408
339 F.2d 604 United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The very most that can be said for the appellant’s patent is that it discloses a mere mechanic’s adaptation of a device in public use and on sale more than a year before the patent was applied for to make that earlier device more readily attachable to the basic structure with, which it was designed to cooperate to-produce a vibrating chair or bed. We-see no need to elaborate upon the District Court’s fully and carefully reasoned opinion. D.C., 232 F.Supp. 372.

Judgment will be entered affirming the-judgment of the District Court dismissing count one of the plaintiff’s complaint.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw