JACK MARRIN WILLIAMSON, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
On the retrial of this case, as our mandate plainly called for, the deposition of Moye was not offered by either party for any purpose. Consequently, conditions (1) and (2) prescribed by our former opinion, Williamson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 311 F. 2d 441, were not pertinent, and the Government was not required to meet them. Entrapment as such on this record was not therefore raised. Nor was there any evidence which the Trial Judge knew either judicially, actually, or factually which indicated that the initiation or prosecution of this case was the fruit of any illegal contingent agreement with Moye. On the intrinsic merits, the evidence amply sustained the finding of guilty.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. REY, 811 F.2d 1453 (11th Cir. 1987)
-
Luna v. Beto, 395 F.2d 35 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Harris v. United States, 400 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 441 (5th Cir. 1962)