NICHOLAS HENRY LUTZ, APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL SCOTT MCNAIR, APPELLEE
NICHOLAS HENRY LUTZ, APPELLANT,
SAMUEL SCOTT MCNAIR, APPELLEE
340 F.2d 709
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1965)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant. The judgment is based upon a jury finding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in the operation of his automobile which was involved in a collision with the defendant’s car. While the question is not without some doubt, we think this record contains evidence upon which reasonable men could disagree concerning negligence on the plaintiff’s part. As such, that question was properly one for the jury to decide. McClure v. Price, 300 F. 2d 538, 543-544 (4 Cir. 1962); Crosby v. Meredith, 300 F. 2d 323, 324 (4 Cir. 1962).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McCLURE v. Price, 300 F.2d 538 (4th Cir. 1962)
- Crosby v. Meredith, 300 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1962)