THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY AND IRVIN LEE BAILEY, PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,
v.
THE CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT, V. THE FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY AND IRVIN LEE BAILEY, PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,
THE CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT, APPELLANT, V. THE FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, APPELLEE
341 F.2d 913
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The Connecticut Fire Insurance Company has appealed from so much of the .judgment of the District Court as was adverse to it. North River Insurance Company, the insurer of the used car •dealer, has not appealed from that part ■of the judgment which was adverse to it, but seeks affirmance of the judgment below.
After full consideration of the briefs ■and argument of counsel, we conclude that the Connecticut policy provides primary coverage, as does North River’a. The reason for our conclusion is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the District Court.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Barney P. Bennett v. People OF the State OF Ill., 356 F.2d 878 (7th Cir. 1966)
-
Scruggs v. Henderson, 380 F.2d 981 (6th Cir. 1967)
-
Ruip v. Commonwealth OF Ky., 400 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence