PALMINA C. GIANNI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SEBASTIAN S. GIANNI, DECEASED, AND EUNICE H. MCMAHON, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD H. MCMAHON, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
FORT WAYNE AIR SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Indiana statute of limitations should have been applied to the wrongful death actions, reversing the dismissal of the complaints.
Plaintiffs' husbands were killed in an airplane crash in Massachusetts. The actions were commenced in Indiana eighteen months after the accident. The …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tolling Provisions cases and more on FLexlaw
GRUBB, District Judge.
Wrongful death actions. Plaintiffs are residents of Connecticut. Their causes of action arise out of an airplane crash in Massachusetts in which their husbands were killed on March 25, 1961. Defendant is an Indiana corporation with its principal office and place of business in Indiana. The alleged negligence in inspecting a plane took place in Indiana. The actions were commenced in the Indiana District Court on September 25, 1962, eighteen months after the accident.
The Massachusetts wrongful death statute requires that such actions shall be commenced within one year from the date of death. It contains a saving clause tolling the statute during the time the defendant is out of the State of Massachusetts. Indiana has a two-year limitation with reference to wrongful death actions. The district court held that the Massachusetts one-year statute of limitations was to be applied, that the Massachusetts tolling provision did not apply, and entered orders dismissing the complaints.
This court has considered and passed upon the conflict of laws question involving Indiana in a decision handed down herewith in the case of Watts v. Pioneer Corn Company, Inc., 342 F. 2d 617 (decided February 11, 1965), where the authorities are there set forth. It would serve no purpose to again set out the authorities on that question herein.
We hold that for the reasons stated in the Watts case, the Indiana statute of limitations should have been applied.
The orders appealed from are hereby reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bowen v. United States, 570 F.2d 1311 (7th Cir. 1978)
-
John F. White D.B.N. v. United States, 680 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1982)
-
Wright v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 522 F.2d 1376 (5th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Watts v. Pioneer Corn Co., Inc., 342 F.2d 617 (7th Cir. 1965)