WILLIAM HOLLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file his lodged petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED by the court en banc that appellant’s aforesaid motion be granted and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged petition for rehearing en banc, and on consideration whereof, it is
FURTHER ORDERED by the court en banc that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
BAZELON, Chief Judge, would grant appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc. .See his dissenting statement in Hardy and Ferguson v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C.-, 343 F. 2d 233.
FAHY, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order in so far as it pertains to the denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc.
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order. WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, prior to his retirement on October 15, 1964, voted to deny appellant’s aforesaid motion and petition.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gilbert v. United States, 366 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1966)
-
Adams v. United States, 399 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
-
Williams v. United States, 419 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hardy v. United States, 343 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1964)