SI ZENTNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA AND ASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER NEW YORK, LOCAL 802, AFFILIATED WITH AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
SI ZENTNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA AND ASSOCIATED MUSICIANS OF GREATER NEW YORK, LOCAL 802, AFFILIATED WITH AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
343 F.2d 758
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
When the case was before Judge Wein-feld plaintiff challenged the Federation’s “work dues equivalents” as violating § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended in 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 186, and § 101(a) (3), of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a) (3). In this court the latter ground of attack was not pressed. The challenge under § 302 is baseless, for reasons well expressed in the opinion of Judge Wein- feld, reported at 237 F.Supp. 457, denying the application for preliminary in-junctive relief.
We affirm the order below, and since it is obvious that there is no merit in plaintiff’s claims, we direct that the court below dismiss the complaint.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elec. Specialty Co. v. Int'l Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937 (2d Cir. 1969)
-
The Susquehanna Corp. v. PAN Am. Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075 (5th Cir. 1970)
-
Stein v. Elihu Oshinsky, 348 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1965)