INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 323, SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 130, PALM COAST BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL, INC., GEORGE C. HUDSPETH AND ROGER C. HUDSPETH, APPELLANTS,
v.
RICHWAY, A DIVISION OF FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLEE
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 323, SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 130, PALM COAST BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL, INC., GEORGE C. HUDSPETH AND ROGER C. HUDSPETH, APPELLANTS,
RICHWAY, A DIVISION OF FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLEE
436 So. 2d 374
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1983)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order imposing a temporary injunction. We affirm upon authority of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County, 436 U.S. 180, 98 S.Ct. 1745, 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978), whose rationale is buttressed by the fact that the National Labor Relations Board had earlier determined: (1) that the conduct of Richway and its state court application were not violations of the National Labor Relations Act, and (2) that the appellants’ complaint filed before us be dismissed thereby indicating that it would not provide a forum for this dispute.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Casavan v. Land O'Lakes Realty, 526 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…related to the final judgment, but rather the proper [*216] test is whether the trial court is proceeding in a matter which affects the subject matter on appeal. See also Bailey v. Bailey, 392 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Cf. Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Since an order awarding attorney’s fees after entry of final judgment is a final appealable order, Bernstein, supra; Morand v. Stoneburner, 516 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), there is no reason why an appeal of the final judgme…
-
ASH v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 649 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…ee Fla.R.App.P. 9.110(b). Absent permission from this court, the juvenile court had no authority to enter any order once the district court obtained jurisdiction by the filing of the notice of appeal. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.600(b); Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) (trial court has no jurisdiction to modify the very order appealed from during the pendency of the appeal) (citing Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)), review dismissed, 453 So. 2d 1364 (Fla.1984). Further, Ash did no…
-
Tobitha Crofton Thompson v. Honorable James R. Stewart, Jr., 569 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. We grant the writ of prohibition and quash the trial court’s order setting the supplemental petition for modification for trial. The trial court does not have [*1373] jurisdiction to modify an order under appeal. Campbell v. Campbell, 436 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. dismissed, 453 So. 2d 1364 (Fla.1984); Buckley v. Buckley, 343 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), appeal dismissed, 362 So. 2d 1050 (Fla.1978); Kalmutz v. Kalmutz, 299 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). The underlying final judgme…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sears v. San Diego Cnty. Dist. Council of Carpenters, 436 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1978)