GARDENS OF FAITH, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that payments made by cemetery corporations to certificate holders were not deductible as land costs and were taxable as dividends to the extent of corporate earnings and profits.
Two cemetery corporations issued "Certificates of Indebtedness" requiring payment of 25% of burial lot sales for 50 years. The Commissioner of Interna…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mixed Question Of Law And Fact cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Raymond F. Cushing and wife were instrumental in organizing two cemetery corporations, Gardens of Faith, Inc., and Evergreen Memorial Gardens, Inc. The corporations issued certain “Certificates of Indebtedness” for undetermined amounts, which required them to pay to the certificate holders 25% of the base sales price of every burial lot sold by the corporations for 50 years.
The issues in this appeal are the appropriate tax treatment of the sums thus paid, both in the corporations’ returns and those of the certificate holders, Cush ing and wife. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue contends that the certificate holders are equity investors in the respective corporations and therefore the corporations are not entitled to deduct as land costs the payments máde to the certificate holders, and that amounts received by the individual taxpayers with respect to the “Certificates of Indebtedness” are, to the extent of the corporate earnings and profits, taxable as dividends. The court upheld the Commissioner’s contentions. 1964 P-H T. C. Memo, Dec., Par. 64, 178.
The opposing arguments addressed to us by the taxpayers in their brief and oral presentation are fairly stated and convincingly answered in the exhaustive opinion of the Tax Court. This case presents a mixed question of law and fact. The correct legal principle was followed and the resolution of the factual issue by the Tax Court was warranted.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sherwood Mem'l Gardens, Inc. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 350 F.2d 225 (7th Cir. 1965)
-
Peterson v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 380 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967)
-
Rose Hills Mem'l Park Ass'n v. The United States, 463 F.2d 425 (Ct. Cl. 1972)