GORDON H. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROY P. PARHAM AND OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
GORDON H. MITCHELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
ROY P. PARHAM AND OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
345 F.2d 797
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1965)
Caution
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed because of the lack of an appealable order. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 10 Cir., 319 F. 2d 53; and Crutcher v. Joyce, 10 Cir., 134 F. 2d 809, 813, 814.
On remand, if the plaintiff desires to amend his pleadings, he must do so within 10 days of the date of remand. If he fails to amend, the court should promptly enter a final order dismissing the action.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kauffman v. Moss, 420 F.2d 1270 (3d Cir. 1970)
-
Negrich v. Hohn, 379 F.2d 213 (3d Cir. 1967)
-
Brown v. Joseph, 463 F.2d 1046 (3d Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Crutcher v. Joyce, 134 F.2d 809 (10th Cir. 1943)
- Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. The City OF Tulsa, 319 F.2d 53 (10th Cir. 1963)