FLORENCE LUSTIG CROSSMAN, A/K/A FLORENCE LUSTIG, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS FLORENCE LUSTIG, APPELLANT,
v.
FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., APPELLEE; FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., APPELLANT, V. FLORENCE LUSTIG CROSSMAN, A/K/A FLORENCE LUSTIG, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS FLORENCE LUSTIG, APPELLEE
FLORENCE LUSTIG CROSSMAN, A/K/A FLORENCE LUSTIG, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS FLORENCE LUSTIG, APPELLANT,
FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., APPELLEE; FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., APPELLANT, V. FLORENCE LUSTIG CROSSMAN, A/K/A FLORENCE LUSTIG, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS FLORENCE LUSTIG, APPELLEE
346 F.2d 152
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed to the extent that the appellant is to recover the principal amount of $6,000 and attorney’s fees of $1,500. The cross-appéllant is correct in its challenge of the inclusion in the judgment of the items for travel expense of witnesses and witness fees. There is no basis in the law for the allowance of these two items.
As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carter v. Dist. OF Columbia, 795 F.2d 116 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
-
Crossman v. Babs, Inc., 384 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1967)
Authorities Cited
- Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. & Babs, Inc. v. Crossman, 323 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1963)