JOAN FORSYTH WILLIS, SHIRLEY L. HAMMOND AND EVERARD L. HAMMOND, APPELLANTS,
v.
CLAY L. STRICKLAND, ET AL., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case interprets Florida's dram shop statute (section 768.125) to determine whether selling alcohol to an underage person requires actual knowledge of their age or whether circumstantial evidence of apparent youth suffices. The court reversed summary judgment against ABC Liquors, holding that a jury could infer knowledge from the minor's youthful appearance.
A willful sale under the statute requires knowledge that the recipient is underage, but such knowledge may be proved by direct evidence of actual knowledge or by circumstantial evidence, including the apparent age of the person. Whether a person's appearance is sufficient to establish knowledge of underage status is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury, and the minor's apparent youth here created a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.
[1] A "willful" sale or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person not of lawful drinking age requires knowledge that the recipient is not of lawful drinking age.
[2] Knowledge of a person's unlawful drinking age may be proven by direct evidence of actual knowledge or by circumstantial evidence.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A "willful" sale or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person not of lawful drinking age does require knowledge that the recipient is not of lawful drinking age. However such inculpatory knowledge of the age of a particular person may be proved by direct evidence of actual knowledge or such knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence.”
Establishes that willfulness requires knowledge of underage status, but allows both direct and circumstantial proof of that knowledge.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClay L. Strickland, a 16-year-old with the appearance, speech, and mannerism of a 16-year-old, was sold alcoholic beverages by ABC Liquors employees w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Claim For Punitive Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
COWART, Judge.
This case involves an interpretation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides in part:
[A] person who willfully and unlawfully sells or furnishes alcoholic beverages to a person who is not of lawful drinking age ... may become liable for injury or damage caused by or resulting from the intoxication of such minor or person.
In their second amended complaint seeking compensatory and punitive damages appellants allege they were injured as a result of an automobile accident caused by the intoxication of one Clay L. Strickland, a person not of lawful drinking age, to whom employees of ABC Liquors, Inc. (ABC) willfully and unlawfully sold alcoholic beverages. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of ABC.
On the motion for summary judgment the trial court considered various evidentiary matters (affidavits and depositions). While this evidence is not in conflict, the parties differ in their interpretation of the word “willfully” in the above statute.
The evidentiary material before the trial court indicates that at the relevant time Clay was sixteen years of age and had the appearance, speech and mannerism of a sixteen year old and that without inquiring or checking identification as to his age two employees of ABC sold and furnished Clay beverages which caused him to become intoxicated.
ABC argues that a “willful” sale under the statute requires more than mere neglect on the part of an employee to check the age of a customer and that it requires proof of an intentional sale or service of alcoholic beverages made with actual knowledge that the age of the person being served is under the lawful drinking age.
A “willful” sale or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person not of lawful drinking age does require knowledge that the recipient is not of lawful drinking age. However such inculpatory knowledge of the age of a particular person may be proved by direct evidence of actual knowledge or such knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence of such knowledge may consist of facts relating to the apparent age of a person. The appearance of a person alone can impart knowledge of his or her age within certain ranges and to certain degrees of certainty. Whether it does or not in a particular instance, and to what extent, would normally be a question of fact for the jury to determine. The circumstantial evidence in this case, consisting of facts relating to Clay’s appearance as being that of a person who is not of lawful drinking age, is sufficient to create a genuine issue as to the material fact of ABC’s knowledge of Clay’s age and to preclude a summary judgment as to that issue.
Because the complaint failed to allege fault on the part of ABC independent of fault of its employees in serving alcoholic beverages to Clay (for which ABC is vicariously liable), we affirm the order striking the claim against ABC for punitive damages. Mercury Motors Express, Inc. v. Smith, 393 So. 2d 545 (Fla.1981).
The summary judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Goin v. Comm'n ON Ethics, 658 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…s resulting from willful and unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages to a minor, proof of the inculpatory knowledge of age may be established by circumstantial evidence consisting of facts relating to the apparent age of a person. Willis v. Strickland, 436 So. 2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), petition for review denied, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla.1984). Although a criminal conspiracy conviction requires proof of both an agreement to accomplish a criminal offense and an intention to commit the offense, such proof may be…
-
Gorman v. Albertson's, Inc., 519 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…o allegedly sold the alcoholic beverages to Kimbrell, knowledge that a purchaser of alcoholic beverages is not of lawful drinking age may be established by circumstantial evidence relating to the apparent age of the person. See Willis v. Strickland, 436 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), petition for review denied sub nom., ABC Liquors v. Willis, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla.1984). See also, French v. City of West Palm Beach, 513 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Furthermore, whether in a particular instance the person’s a…
-
Tuttle v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd., 551 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…impart knowledge of his or her age within certain ranges and to certain degrees of certainty. Whether it does or not in a particular instance, and to what extent, would normally be a question of fact for the jury to determine. Willis v. Strickland, 436 So. 2d 1011, 1012-13 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), review denied sub nom., ABC Liquors, Inc. v. Willis, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1984); see Gorman v. Albertson’s, Inc., 519 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also French v. City of West Palm Beach, 513 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 4th…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mercury Motors Express, Inc. v. Smith, 393 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 1981)