JAMES LEE ROYSDON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
James Roysdon appeals his judgment and sentence for second degree murder. While we find no merit in appellant’s numerous contentions, we are disturbed by the trial court’s identification of appellant’s crime as “MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE, [section] 782.04(la) [sic],” a “First” degree felony, “(MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE, as included).” Because we find this description somewhat confusing, we remand appellant’s judgment for correction to reflect his adjudication for murder in the second degree under section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes (1981). Otherwise, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence in all respects.
REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
OTT, C.J., and BOARDMAN and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murray Rosen v. Marlin, 486 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…is not a case where a party refused to pay over to the demanding party a specific fund capable of separate identification required to be deposited into a special account as was the case in Aero International Corp. v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 437 So. 2d 156 (Fla.3d DCA 1983) pet. for rev. den., 449 So. 2d 264 (Fla.1984). A breach of contract to pay money in general does not constitute conversion under the law of Florida. Douglas v. Braman Porsche Audi, Inc., supra. The trial court found no separate co…1 / 2
-
Futch v. Head, 511 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…s is not a case where a party refused to pay over to the demanding party a specific fund capable of separate identification required to be deposited in a separate account as was the case in Aero International Corp. v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 437 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for rev. den., 449 So. 2d 269 (Fla.1984). Id. at 624. Neither does the instant case involve Futch’s refusal to pay over to Head a “specific fund capable of separate identification.” Futch had an agreement to pay Head a comm…
-
Senfeld v. The Bank of Nova Scotia Tr. Co. (cayman) Ltd., 450 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…tone of the letters, it is clear to us that a demand for return of the money was made upon Senfeld. . The property herein is sufficiently identifiable to be capable of being converted. See Aero International Corp. v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 437 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); (obligation to pay accrued interest on an escrow account); Allen v. Gordon, 429 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (money wrongfully withdrawn from bank account); All Cargo Transport, Inc. v. Florida East Coast Railway., 355 So. 2d 1…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence